[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [NSW] If it's not our fault, the trains aren't late

Subject: Re: [NSW] If it's not our fault, the trains aren't late
From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 00:17:26 GMT
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: CWO Customer - reports relating to abuse should be sent to abuse@cwo.net.au
References: <K24e6.30$zt5.1946@news0.optus.net.au> <WT6e6.303$%3.8720@ozemail.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:30261

Chris Downs (cvdowns@ozemail.com.au) wrote:
> The Telegraph gives "acts of God, suicides, flooding, storm damage and extreme
> heat" as examples of factors that will be taken into account.  I wonder how
> objectively this will be done?  If a 1 in 10 year rain fall event causes
> flooding purely due to blocked drainage or obviously inadequate drainage how
> will this be treated?

And to that end, can flooding at Wolli Creek be used as an excuse not to
include a late running Parramatta train?

Cheers
David

References:
- If it's not our fault, the trains aren't late
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: [NSW] If it's not our fault, the trains aren't late
  - From: "Chris Downs" <cvdowns@ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: On The Beach - accuracy?
Next by Date: Re: (Vic) K191 - steam
Prev by thread: Re: [NSW] If it's not our fault, the trains aren't late
Next by thread: Tasrail staff reassured as new sell-off looms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread