[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DSRM
In article <956ebf$ttn$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
p_andrews@my-deja.com wrote:
> In article <3a7522f1$0$16403$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>,
> "Trevor Edmonds" <trevor_edmonds@dingoblue.net.au> wrote:
> > p_andrews@my-deja.com wrote...
> >
> > > interestinger and interestinger , they're going to close the
> unofficial
> > > site , BUT they don't run it .
> > > They must know who does then and have co-operation .
> >
> > We do know who it is. He is an active member.
> >
> > Trevor
> >
> Why , then ,create a new page . Why not just update the poor sods
page.
> He's done all the ground breaking.
>
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
> That's what I was getting at.
Like GMR they don't have "Board Approval" so you get kicked out.
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
- References:
- DSRM
- From: joeblogggs@my-deja.com
- Re: DSRM
- From: "Trevor Edmonds" <trevor_edmonds@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: DSRM
- From: "Tony Gatt" <baulko@optushome.com.au>
- Re: DSRM
- From: "Trevor Edmonds" <trevor_edmonds@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: DSRM
- From: "Matthew Halpin" <matthewhalpin@dragon.net.au>
- Re: DSRM
- From: "keith malcolm" <kmalcolm@tpg.com.au>
- Re: DSRM
- From: "Trevor Edmonds" <trevor_edmonds@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: DSRM
- From: maikha_l@hotmail.com
- Re: DSRM
- From: p_andrews@my-deja.com
- Re: DSRM
- From: "Trevor Edmonds" <trevor_edmonds@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: DSRM
- From: p_andrews@my-deja.com