[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DSRM

ohhhh I see. If that is the case than fair enough, make it as flash as
possible and......good business!

(apologies if my previous words were a little negetive)

Maikha "V" Ly
http://www.geocities.com/microchip_689



In article <3a713999$0$16386$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>,
  "Trevor Edmonds" <trevor_edmonds@dingoblue.net.au> wrote:
> maikha_l@hotmail.com wrote...
>
> > I've been noted about Dorrigo (Or should I say introduced) by a
fellow
> > gunzel in person who told me people had mixed opinions.
> >
> > I'm certainly interested in finding out about the issues and saga's
> > which have been discussed here (waaayyyy before I heard of
Aus.rail).
> >
> > But it is abit of surprise to find out the website I've been
relying on
> > for DSRM (www.ozemail.com.au/~dsrm) ISN'T OFFICIAL!!
>
> Just because it is not official does not mean that the information and
> photos it contains are wrong. It has been put together by a DSRM
member, but
> has not been approved by the DSRM board. We are working towards an
official
> site.
>
> Trevor
>
>


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/