Re: DSRM

[p_andrews@my-deja.com]

In article <94tvfj$cfn$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  maikha_l@hotmail.com wrote:
> ohhhh I see. If that is the case than fair enough, make it as flash as
> possible and......good business!
>
> (apologies if my previous words were a little negetive)
>
> Maikha "V" Ly
> http://www.geocities.com/microchip_689
>
> In article <3a713999$0$16386$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>,
>   "Trevor Edmonds" <trevor_edmonds@dingoblue.net.au> wrote:
> > maikha_l@hotmail.com wrote...
> >
> > > I've been noted about Dorrigo (Or should I say introduced) by a
> fellow
> > > gunzel in person who told me people had mixed opinions.
> > >
> > > I'm certainly interested in finding out about the issues and
saga's
> > > which have been discussed here (waaayyyy before I heard of
> Aus.rail).
> > >
> > > But it is abit of surprise to find out the website I've been
> relying on
> > > for DSRM (www.ozemail.com.au/~dsrm) ISN'T OFFICIAL!!
> >
> > Just because it is not official does not mean that the information
and
> > photos it contains are wrong. It has been put together by a DSRM
> member, but
> > has not been approved by the DSRM board. We are working towards an
> official
> > site.
> >
> > Trevor
> >
> >
>
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
>
interestinger and interestinger , they're going to close the unofficial
site , BUT they don't run it .
They must know who does then and have co-operation .


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/