[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)

Subject: Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
From: "Chris Downs" <cvdowns@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 12:41:58 +1100
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: OzEmail Ltd, Australia
References: <92vtoe$igr$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <0if85tc4aq1pef0fc1hftmgk5s5b35bclq@4ax.com> <3A566766.91960767@quik.com> <3A566E32.30015777@ozemail.com.au> <3A56B05E.4A8A771F@bigpond.com>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:28110

What stops the train from producing a current from regen. braking?  Regen. is
inoperable (no power available to initiate regen. or it's deliberately made
inoperable or unreceptive overhead prevents it use or ?) if the overhead is
dead?

Chris

jjjim <jjjim@bigpond.com> wrote in message
3A56B05E.4A8A771F@bigpond.com">news:3A56B05E.4A8A771F@bigpond.com...
> Yeah exactly . the trains still going to roll , and in the case of trains
> that use the traction motors for Braking,  there would be now only air
> brakes to tread on :/
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
  - From: jjjim <jjjim@bigpond.com>

References:
- Near miss at Victoria (London)
  - From: james_shugg@my-deja.com
- Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
  - From: Bill Bolton <billbolton@computer.org>
- Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
  - From: davep <davep@quik.com>
- Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
  - From: jjjim <jjjim@bigpond.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
Next by Date: Re: [NSW] A couple of CityRail questions.
Prev by thread: Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
Next by thread: Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread