[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)

Subject: Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 16:21:51 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <92vtoe$igr$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <17575tsjehq35sgtncuk87i4snl8eihg3h@4ax.com> <3A54461C.35B0DB95@bigpond.com> <3A566E88.58ED4F98@ozemail.com.au> <3A56AFF9.E35DE68B@bigpond.com> <lS866.170$Ll4.8153@ozemail.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:28192


"Chris Downs" <cvdowns@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
lS866.170$Ll4.8153@ozemail.com.au">news:lS866.170$Ll4.8153@ozemail.com.au...
> In Sydney (and elsewhere) I thought the "air gap" was the space between the
> two sets of overhead at an overhead anchorage/transition point on main
lines,
> The other type of section was initially provided by "continuous-feed
> wood-break section insulators" (the diamond shaped overhead arrangements).

The air-gap and section insulators are the same thing.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
  - From: "Chris Downs" <cvdowns@ozemail.com.au>

References:
- Near miss at Victoria (London)
  - From: james_shugg@my-deja.com
- Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
  - From: Bill Bolton <billbolton@computer.org>
- Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
  - From: jjjim <jjjim@bigpond.com>
- Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
  - From: jjjim <jjjim@bigpond.com>
- Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
  - From: "Chris Downs" <cvdowns@ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [Very OT] List of Westfields Shoppingtown sizes in NSW
Next by Date: Are JB's sites down?
Prev by thread: Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
Next by thread: Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread