[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why keep Clyde?
- Subject: Re: Why keep Clyde?
- From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael)
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 04:11:44 GMT
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: bleah
- References: <3A09EAF2.2F7C7EB1@dontspamme.au1.ibm.com> <8uspha$9oe$1@shado.bozier.net> <3a11f093$0$19404$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3a12051e@news.iprimus.com.au> <8uvj4s$edh$1@shado.bozier.net> <3A5BDB26.DDCAEDCA@optushome.com.au>
- User-Agent: Xnews/03.08.04
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:28257
Martin Barr-David <martbd@optushome.com.au> wrote in article
<3A5BDB26.DDCAEDCA@optushome.com.au>:
>If you close this station, how would you get to Carlingford?
Instead of running Clyde-Carlingford shuttles, run Olympic Park -
Carlingford services. Makes much sense.
While youre at it, up the frequency on the Carlingford line to 30 minutes
instead of the current 60.
Might be a surprise, but if you improve the accessibility to the line like
this, you'll achieve far more patronage.
M.
--
(To email me just remove ".spam" off my email address).
Whip me, Beat me, just don't Windows ME