[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lineside Photography (again)

Subject: Re: Lineside Photography (again)
From: Patrick <patrick@trafficgiant.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:34:20 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Deja.com
References: <zLn66.9106$B11.151971@monolith.news.easynet.net> <qno66.2898$mO2.10921@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <93eimm$8pj$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A5ADEB1.9949843B@ozemail.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:28301

In article <3A5ADEB1.9949843B@ozemail.com.au>,
  trainman@ozemail.com.au wrote:
> jshugg@westpac.com.au wrote:
> > although I don't think there are that many regular loco-hauled
trains
> > into Canberra these days.  Dappled lighting might be a problem too.
>
> Just the logs.  Has the Oily stopped running yet?  Xploders run the
only
> passenger services.

As of 2 days ago the oil was stil running (with only a dozen wagons and
a 48 & 80)

>
> --
> David Johnson
> trainman@ozemail.com.au
> http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
> ------------------------------------
> These comments are made in a private
> capacity and do not represent the
> official view of State Rail.
> C.O.W.S. Page 11.
>
>


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/

References:
- Lineside Photography (again)
  - From: "Russell Moorhouse" <russell.lm@zoom.co.uk>
- Re: Lineside Photography (again)
  - From: "Ted Gay" <tedgay@bigpond.com>
- Re: Lineside Photography (again)
  - From: jshugg@westpac.com.au
- Re: Lineside Photography (again)
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [Melb] Removal of trams effect business
Next by Date: Port Dock Museum - January Projects update
Prev by thread: Re: Lineside Photography (again)
Next by thread: Re: Lineside Photography (again)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread