[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Railway Digest Jan 2001



Maybe a new editor may do the trick
"Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
8CV76.200356$IP1.7282201@news1.giganews.com">news:8CV76.200356$IP1.7282201@news1.giganews.com...
> "James C." <james_ccj@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> 93mpvr$443$1@nnrp1.deja.com">news:93mpvr$443$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> > What do you think of  January 2001 Railway Digest's new look?
> > I didn't recognise it at the first place(though it was some American
> > magazine) until I saw the BL class on the cover.
> >
> > I reckon it's a great improvement and much better set up. Make the
> > magazine more attractive to new readers and easier to read(traffic
> > section).
>
> Like the look - accuracy is still a problem though (and that is ALL I am
> going to say on this matter).
>
> Dave
>
>