[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Canberra = CityRail?

Subject: Re: Canberra = CityRail?
From: "Kim Saunders" <kims@emmerce.com.au>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:13:06 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Davnet Telecommunications Pty Ltd
References: <WIP86.54$D86.3235@news0.optus.net.au> <940lun$ssh$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <BrR86.88$e%6.14557@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net> <3a642746@news.iprimus.com.au> <3a64d746$0$15475$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3a6582e2.53524880@24.192.1.17>
User-Agent: Pan/0.9.1 (Unix)
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:28887

>>Is CityRail broadening their horizons? Canberra one day,  Melbourne,
>>Perth or Brisbane next? Hmmmmm.

Umm... sorry, just caught the tail end of this thread.

Is this actually happenning? I have always thought that it was pretty
silly that Goulburn has a few cityrail services a day, and yet a center
10 times the population and only 100km further down the line gets no
cityrail service, only overpriced and infrequent countrylink services.

KimS

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Canberra = CityRail?
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)

References:
- Orange pensioners disadvantaged
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: Orange pensioners disadvantaged
  - From: petercook2705@my-deja.com
- Re: Orange pensioners disadvantaged
  - From: "keith malcolm" <kmalcolm@tpg.com.au>
- Canberra = CityRail?
  - From: "Erk" <erk@erkV69.au.com>
- Re: Canberra = CityRail?
  - From: "avachat" <avachat@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: Canberra = CityRail?
  - From: lbrown2@bigpond.com (Brown Family)

Prev by Date: Re: New Australian Railway Photography Web Site
Next by Date: Re: Canberra = CityRail?
Prev by thread: Re: Canberra = CityRail?
Next by thread: Re: Canberra = CityRail?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread