Re: Red Rattlers be damned!

["Philip Shortus" <Shortus@bigpond.com>]

Roger Lloyd <rogerlloyd@optusnet.com.au.nospam> wrote in message
3a6ccf94$0$16388$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3a6ccf94$0$16388$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
> As an expat NSW railfan living in Victoria for the past 28 years, I object
> to the NSW press and some misguided railfans calling the old single decker
> electric cars "red rattlers". This is a term unfortunately stolen from
> Victoria where it was used (quite correctly) to describe the Tait cars on
> the Melbourne suburban system - believe me, they did rattle and shake!
They
> had two sliding doors for each compartment (one each side) and loose
fitting
> windows and, like the old P class Sydney trams, really required some form
of
> diagonal bracing to stiffen them up. When they started to move, the
> underframe moved first and the roof followed, if you get what I mean. By
> comparison, the Sydney Leeds type cars were steel bodied and gave a firm
and
> solid ride and DID NOT RATTLE!!! With their high seat backs they were more
> comfortable than Tangaras and newer stock.
> Roger Lloyd
>
>
Hey shut your mouth, don't talk about the "red rattlers" like that, typical
Victorian's always having a whinge about Sydney just because we "take" your
words, just cause Sydney had better single deck suburbans than in Melbourne!