[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Revenue Protection Officers



"Peter Dwyer" <peter.dwyer@qr.com.au> wrote in message
9c7j0p$g011@inetbws1.citec.com.au">news:9c7j0p$g011@inetbws1.citec.com.au...
| Tezza <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
| > "Erk" <erk@erkV69.au.com> wrote in message
| > | "David Johnson" <trainman@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
| > | | Tezza wrote:
| > | |
| > | | > The SRA has a Drug Analysis section?
| > | |
| > | | Yeah!  When you see them at TCAC, you call in sick.
| > | |
| > |
| > | Didn't Tezza have a whinge about them 3 months ago (or was he being
| > | sarcastic?)
| >
| > I've never heard of the "Drug Analysis section" before. I gather he's
| > refering to the leather jackets who do the random (targeted) breath
tests.
| > Have I had a whinge about them? Not that I'm aware of. i doin't do early
| > morning shifts so they don't bother me.
|
|
| It was a while back, it was during a discussion that stated that drivers
| were being breath tested for reporting signalling problems, or so you
stated.

That's usually done by loco inspectors.