[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Melbourne railway - civil engineering
- Subject: Re: Melbourne railway - civil engineering
- From: "Andrew Collis" <andrew.collis@virgin.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 09:37:22 +0100
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Virgin Net Usenet Service
- References: <_haE6.50$Cu.22537@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com> <3AE141A5.4817789D@alphalink.com.au> <3ae16298$0$25523$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
- Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:35575
Thanks for the information. I'm looking to move to Melbourne (from London)
next year and wanted to get a clearer picture of the set up between operator
and maintenance.
Regards
Andrew
B. wrote in message
<3ae16298$0$25523$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>...
>"Reece Isaac" <throttle@alphalink.com.au> wrote in message
>news:3AE141A5.4817789D@alphalink.com.au...
>> Andrew Collis wrote:
>
>>> Can anyone tell me who is responsible for the civil and track
>>> engineering maintenance on the melbourne system ?
>
>> It depends on which part of the system you and exactly what item U want
>> to know about? There seems to be no-one entity responsible. It is
>> covered by John Holland, ETR. and a division of what used to be ABB.
>> Even Freight Australia seems to have trouble who is responsible for
>> what and who pays for what!
>
>AFAIK the routine maintenance contracts are as follows:
>
>Connex - Alstom
>M>Train - Thiess Infraco
>FA - EDI PTR
>ARTC - EDI PTR
>
>John Holland bought most of the track machines and the tie renewal
business,
>and can be seen doing their thing everywhere.
>
>--
>B.
>
>Email - b at four12 dot net
>ICQ# - eight two three two nine seven three four
>Phone - long, short, long, long.
>
>