Re: INNCORRECT train information in the Melbourne

[usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael)]

ME TOO!!

but thiz iz da inn3rn3t!!!!@~! w3 d0nt n33d n0 st1nk1n rulz!!~!
mammal@optushome.com.au (Rob Kearey) wrote in 
<3AE3E533.231A0FBC@optushome.com.au>:

>Daniel Bowen wrote:
>
>> Actually I suspect for most people, putting the reply at the top avoids
>> readers having to scroll to see it.
>
>No, no, no! Naughty Daniel! Lay off the toxic custard!
>
>Having people scrolling past the quoted text is a *desirable* behaviour,
>as it gives them the opportunity to get the context of a posting without
>having down to see the quoted text, then scroll *up* to see the reply.
>Why, one might as well suggest that posters use no quoted text for
>establishing context at all, and that way madness lies.
>
>Top-posting is just Bad. When in doubt, I always turn to the Scripture:
>
>http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html
>
>> Daniel
>
>


-- 
To email me, just remove ".spam" or else your reply gets directed to the 
bit bucket.

Never engage in an intellectual argument with an idiot.
They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience -- 
(Unknown)