Re: XPT's Reduced

["Ted Gay" <tedgay@bigpond.com>]

"Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
tgXA6.142288$lj4.4408571@news6.giganews.com">news:tgXA6.142288$lj4.4408571@news6.giganews.com...
> "Ted Gay" <tedgay@bigpond.com> wrote in message
> VTWA6.1065$482.4731@newsfeeds.bigpond.com">news:VTWA6.1065$482.4731@newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
> >
> > "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
> > iPVA6.142143$lj4.4405782@news6.giganews.com">news:iPVA6.142143$lj4.4405782@news6.giganews.com...
> > > <Jack> wrote in message
3ad4249d.25667755@news.dingoblue.net.au">news:3ad4249d.25667755@news.dingoblue.net.au...
> > > > On Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:08:43 GMT, "Glenn J-B"
<grjb@optushome.com.au>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >Now that it seems the sets will be reduced to 5 cars, do you think
> that
> > > > >Countrylink might finally realise that they no longer have a
> marketable
> > > > >product?
> > > >
> > > > I might be wrong. but 5 cars was the original consist of these
trains
> > >
> > > Whilst this is true, services to Melbourne, Brisbane and Murwillumbah
> was
> > > certainly never the originally intended use of these trains (if we are
> > going
> > > for original intentions).
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > >
> > And all 5 cars were 1st class with a premium fare!
>
> That was never intended in the original concept either!
>
What was intended in the original concept?

Ted