Re: SRA admits liability for rail crash

["Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>]

Ivan, I would shut up before you make an even more spectacular fool of
yourself. "Double Jeopary?" [sic] Whatever you say, it is obvious to all and
sundry that you have a vendetta against State Rail over being done for fare
evasion. If everything worked properly, you would probably complain that you
had nothing to complain about. A system the size of State Rail cannot be
expected to work faultlessly - so get used to it.

Dave

"Ivan Smith" <ivsmith11@hotmail.nospam.com> wrote in message
2SbB6.2546$W7.4877@news-server.bigpond.net.au">news:2SbB6.2546$W7.4877@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "David Bromage" <dbromage@fang.omni.com.au> wrote in message
> 3AD54414.D7C01EAE@fang.omni.com.au">news:3AD54414.D7C01EAE@fang.omni.com.au...
> > Glenbrook rail disaster victims today won a major victory in heir class
> > action against the State Rail Authority after the NSW Supreme Court was
> > told it had admitted liability for the crash.
>
> Oh gee, like it didn't involve them and wasn't caused by them and their
> cruddy system?
>
> Event Majeur doesn't cover it properly, so I guess Double Jeopary does,
and
> they thought they could use their act to get off it, only to be caught by
> the Motor Vehicles Accident Act, and now civil claims.
>
> LOL! The SRA deserves everything it got from the Royal Commision and then
> some until they pick up their collective act.
>
> Ivan
>
>
>