Re: [NSW]CCTV Spying on staff

["Bifa" <sweetpea@poboxes.com>]

Rod,

I also would hate to have anything to do with industrial relations in SRA.
But the Subject of this thread is "Spying on staff" and this incident is is
obviously NOT covert or secret and is therefore not spying regardless of any
industrial agreement.  What was 'private' about this driver crossing a
track?  How exactly was their privacy invaded?

If it is a matter of a breach of an IR agreement then call it that.  Don't
inflame it by using such terms as "Spying" and "Invasion of Privacy"

As for pulling funding from 3801, that would not affect me in the slightest.

All you can do to me is have the trains delayed, or not stop at the
scheduled stations or not run at all and then I would be inconvenienced.

Oh dear, I forgot, you do that to me all the time now.

Bifa


"Rjaygee" <dartmouthmotel@bigpond.com> wrote in message
GENz6.11276$45.64554@newsfeeds.bigpond.com">news:GENz6.11276$45.64554@newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
> I would hate to have some of you guys in charge of industrial relations,
you
> would have the staff out in no time. If the staff have agreed to cameras
> being installed under certain conditions and that agreement is abused then
> any contra use of the camera's is an invasion of privacy.  In the case of
> the non vested train driver how do we know he has been accurately
> identified.  Frankly this is just some little Hitler sucking up
managements
> arse who dobbed him in.  I hope the union takes this issue as far as it
can.
> If thats Lillico's attitude to workers then the State Labor government
> should pull all funding from 3801.
> Cheers
> Rod Gayford (also workplace delegate)
>
> "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
> 3acf2f1a$0$25508$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3acf2f1a$0$25508$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
> > "Bifa" <sweetpea@poboxes.com> wrote in message
> > p_Ez6.9512$Xi1.72261@news-server.bigpond.net.au">news:p_Ez6.9512$Xi1.72261@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> > | Spying, by definition, is the keeping of a SECRET watch.
> > |
> > | Every SRA cctv camera is in a well known location and any SRA employee
> who
> > | doesn't know they are there and where they are is obviously too stupid
> to
> > be
> > | in charge of a train.
> > |
> > | It is not covert.  It is not secret.  It is not an invasion of
privacy.
> > And
> > | it is not spying.  The CCTV cameras are there for Safety and security.
> > This
> > | was obviously an unsafe action by the driver.
> > |
> > | It is intersting that no-one in this thread seems to be concerned
about
> > the
> > | safety implications of the driver not working within the safety rules.
> >
> > The ridiculous super vests have not reduced the number of Drivers
injured
> or
> > killed by trains - it's hard to reduce something that's already at zero.
> The
> > morons meanwhile actually got killed in greater numbers after the
> > introduction of the super vest.
> >
> >
>
>