Re: [NSW]CCTV Spying on staff

["Rjaygee" <dartmouthmotel@bigpond.com>]

I would hate to have some of you guys in charge of industrial relations, you
would have the staff out in no time. If the staff have agreed to cameras
being installed under certain conditions and that agreement is abused then
any contra use of the camera's is an invasion of privacy.  In the case of
the non vested train driver how do we know he has been accurately
identified.  Frankly this is just some little Hitler sucking up managements
arse who dobbed him in.  I hope the union takes this issue as far as it can.
If thats Lillico's attitude to workers then the State Labor government
should pull all funding from 3801.
Cheers
Rod Gayford (also workplace delegate)

"Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
3acf2f1a$0$25508$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3acf2f1a$0$25508$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
> "Bifa" <sweetpea@poboxes.com> wrote in message
> p_Ez6.9512$Xi1.72261@news-server.bigpond.net.au">news:p_Ez6.9512$Xi1.72261@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> | Spying, by definition, is the keeping of a SECRET watch.
> |
> | Every SRA cctv camera is in a well known location and any SRA employee
who
> | doesn't know they are there and where they are is obviously too stupid
to
> be
> | in charge of a train.
> |
> | It is not covert.  It is not secret.  It is not an invasion of privacy.
> And
> | it is not spying.  The CCTV cameras are there for Safety and security.
> This
> | was obviously an unsafe action by the driver.
> |
> | It is intersting that no-one in this thread seems to be concerned about
> the
> | safety implications of the driver not working within the safety rules.
>
> The ridiculous super vests have not reduced the number of Drivers injured
or
> killed by trains - it's hard to reduce something that's already at zero.
The
> morons meanwhile actually got killed in greater numbers after the
> introduction of the super vest.
>
>