[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: STN's

Subject: Re: STN's
From: "Geoff Lillico" <glillic@msn.com.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 09:24:35 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
References: <6%Ay6.8835$45.51681@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <3ACBCE2D.BE61E45@iprimus.com.au> <3acc231c$0$25510$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3ACD8D95.ED43241E@iprimus.com.au>
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:34457

In the segregated Rail Industry we now "enjoy", STNs, Weekly Notices,
etc.,are the concern of a lot of people OTHER than SRA employees. State Rail
uses its Despatch for the distribution to its employees. RIC uses electronic
means to distribute to other users.

--
Geoff Lillico

"Anita Lukaszyk" <neety@iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
3ACD8D95.ED43241E@iprimus.com.au">news:3ACD8D95.ED43241E@iprimus.com.au...
> Kevin Sewell wrote:
>
> > Is there copyright on STN's?
>
> They are supposed to be "for the information of employees and not for
> publication". But it also says for "Station Masters, Guards, Drivers and
> all other concerned".
>
> What if "all other concerned" are not employees? :)
>
> --
> There's the RIGHT way, the WRONG way, and the RAIL way.
>
> Anita Lukaszyk
> neety@iprimus.com.au
> http://www.ozemail.com.au/~neety

References:
- Railway weekly notices
  - From: "Philip Shortus" <Shortus@bigpond.com>
- Re: STN's
  - From: "Kevin Sewell" <kevinsewell@optusnet.com.au>
- Re: STN's
  - From: Anita Lukaszyk <neety@iprimus.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: A Stunning example of the inbalance of the Rail Safety Act 1993 (NSW)
Next by Date: [NSW] Tenders for new Rail Carriages
Prev by thread: Re: STN's
Next by thread: Re: Railway weekly notices
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread