[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A Stunning example of the inbalance of the Rail Safety Act 1993 (NSW)

Subject: Re: A Stunning example of the inbalance of the Rail Safety Act 1993 (NSW)
From: nick@zeta.org.au (Nick Andrew)
Date: 7 Apr 2001 09:14:26 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail,aus.legal
Organization: Zeta Internet, http://www.zeta.org.au/
References: <wNQy6.4633$Xi1.39255@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <3ACCEEFB.3C33D70F@spin.net.au>
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:34456 aus.legal:7141

Marvin The Martian <choochoo@spin.net.au> writes:

> I don't think there should be a service guarantee because there is many things
>that could happen that could stop a service being provided.

That's why a service guarantee is important - to focus their attention
on minimising the number of things which go wrong and cause trains to
not run as scheduled.

Nick.
-- 
Kralizec Internet                       Data: +61-2-9837-1183, 9837-1868
Zeta Microcomputer Software             Fax: +61-2-9233-6545 Voice: 9837-1397
P.O. Box 177, Riverstone NSW 2765       http://www.zeta.org.au/

References:
- A Stunning example of the inbalance of the Rail Safety Act 1993 (NSW)
  - From: "Ivan Smith" <ivsmith11@hotmail.nospam.com>
- Re: A Stunning example of the inbalance of the Rail Safety Act 1993 (NSW)
  - From: Marvin The Martian <choochoo@spin.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: AMWU not happy with ASR China rollingstock order.
Next by Date: Re: STN's
Prev by thread: Re: A Stunning example of the inbalance of the Rail Safety Act 1993 (NSW)
Next by thread: Re: A Stunning example of the inbalance of the Rail Safety Act 1993 (NSW)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread