[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Truckies not happy with livestock rail subsidies

Subject: Re: Truckies not happy with livestock rail subsidies
From: David Bromage <dbromage@fang.omni.com.au>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 09:43:37 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: a roadblock on the Information Superhighway
References: <3ACA8936.1AB6F72D@fang.omni.com.au> <3acba77f$0$25469$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3acc1f2d$0$25488$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:34328

"James C." wrote:
> 
> > You mean that they still carry livestock by train in Queensland? I thought
> > all that traffic went to road years ago! What other Australian rail
> > operators still carry cattle, sheep, horses, etc. by train?
> 
> Only QR, QR have a huge share in live stock transport within QLD, and this
> made truckies VERY VERY jealous so these trcuk companies frequently made
> these stupid statements on media.

When did AN cease livestock transport?

Cheers
David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Truckies not happy with livestock rail subsidies
  - From: Tell <telljb@ozemail.com.au>

References:
- Truckies not happy with livestock rail subsidies
  - From: David Bromage <dbromage@fang.omni.com.au>
- Re: Truckies not happy with livestock rail subsidies
  - From: "John Wayman" <trecker@bigpond.com>
- Re: Truckies not happy with livestock rail subsidies
  - From: "James C." <james_ccj@optusnetdotcomdotau>

Prev by Date: "Possibly Flinders St:
Next by Date: Re: [MELB] City Loop issues
Prev by thread: Re: Truckies not happy with livestock rail subsidies
Next by thread: Re: Truckies not happy with livestock rail subsidies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread