[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Truckies not happy with livestock rail subsidies

Subject: Re: Truckies not happy with livestock rail subsidies
From: "John Wayman" <trecker@bigpond.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:02:44 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <3ACA8936.1AB6F72D@fang.omni.com.au>
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:34206

You mean that they still carry livestock by train in Queensland? I thought
all that traffic went to road years ago! What other Australian rail
operators still carry cattle, sheep, horses, etc. by train?

Cheers
John Wayman

"David Bromage" <dbromage@fang.omni.com.au> wrote in message
3ACA8936.1AB6F72D@fang.omni.com.au">news:3ACA8936.1AB6F72D@fang.omni.com.au...
> Queensland Rail (QR) has been accused of hurting small rural communities
> by trying to monopolise the livestock transport market.
>
>
http://www.abc.net.au/news/regionals/capricornia/monthly/regcap-4apr2001-3.h
tm

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Truckies not happy with livestock rail subsidies
  - From: andrew hebron <androoh@uq.net.au>
- Re: Truckies not happy with livestock rail subsidies
  - From: "James C." <james_ccj@optusnetdotcomdotau>

References:
- Truckies not happy with livestock rail subsidies
  - From: David Bromage <dbromage@fang.omni.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Old Sydneham goods yard (NSW)
Next by Date: Re: Comments posted on this ng, by myself
Prev by thread: Re: Truckies not happy with livestock rail subsidies
Next by thread: Re: Truckies not happy with livestock rail subsidies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread