Re: CityRail Olympic Passenger Numbers

["Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>]

"B." <gunzel412@dingoblue.gunzel.net.au> wrote in message 39d1b5e0$1$26525$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:39d1b5e0$1$26525$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
> Tezza <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
> 39d1adff$0$26552$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:39d1adff$0$26552$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
> > "B." <gunzel412@dingoblue.gunzel.net.au> wrote in message
> news:39d1a398$0$26533
> >> Tezza <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
> >>> "Michael" <usenet.spam@gunzel.net> wrote in message
>
> >>>> I'm sure Outhouse Express would have an option to "View in
> >>>> Fixed-Width". If not, get a decent newsreader. Xnews[1] does
> >>>> just fine.  As does Forte Agent and Free Agent.
>
> >>> Why would I bother, it looks just fine in Outlook Express.
>
> >> No it doesn't.
>
> > Yes it does.
>
> No it doesn't.

Yes it does

>
> >>  Tezzas table was wandering all over the place, even in
> >> my Outlook Express.
>
> > Maybe you need an upgrade.
>
> O.E. 5.00 is sufficiently current thank you.

Yet in 5.50 it looks fine.

>
> >> Utterly unintelligible.
>
> > Yet you could read it.
>
> I could read the corrected table as posted by Malcolm.

Which was unaligned.


>Not yours.
> Big difference.
>
> >> Anyway, the percentage increase on Sunday 17th October
>
> > Maybe not.
>
> OK, September maybe.
>
> >> was very appropriate.
>
> > Why?
>
> Look at the percentage increase.  Overacting I'd say.

Better check your calculator, it's an increase of 412.17391%