[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 4204 too heavy

Subject: Re: 4204 too heavy
From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 00:55:22 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <FDSx5.11$Jt5.3317@news0.optus.net.au> <SPZx5.236$O7.4762@ozemail.com.au> <YV1y5.424$O7.10908@ozemail.com.au> <39CB4C0D.72300DAA@ozemail.com.au> <8qfkp5$jig$1@otis.netspace.net.au>
Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:18633

Robert Parnell wrote:

> > Why bother?   What is stopping it from running via Demondrille?
> >
> The axle load limit has been placed on the entire Demondrille - Blayney
> section. As stated by Ian, attempts to have the weight of 4204 reduced (less
> fuel etc) are being made.

OK, so what axle loads are being used on the FA grain trains?

--
David Johnson
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
------------------------------------
These comments are made in a private
capacity and do not represent the
official view of State Rail.
C.O.W.S. Page 11.

References:
- 4204 too heavy
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: 4204 too heavy
  - From: "Ian Larcher" <metalastic@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: 4204 too heavy
  - From: "Paul Jones" <jonesclan@free.net.au>
- Re: 4204 too heavy
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: 4204 too heavy
  - From: "Robert Parnell" <rparnell@netspace.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: The Fouth in the series of DUMB questions
Next by Date: Re: Re: THIRD ADDENDUM [Webpage Ad] webpage updated!!!
Prev by thread: Re: 4204 too heavy
Next by thread: Re: 4204 too heavy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread