[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: standardising Victoria

Subject: Re: standardising Victoria
From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 23:09:26 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: CWO Customer - reports relating to abuse should be sent to abuse@optus.net.au
References: <6sQJ5.102$UB3.5331@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net> <TgRJ5.36$%43.6814@news0.optus.net.au> <39F84A91.52A08CE8@VICSIG.alphalink.com.au>
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:21826

Chris Gordon (cmgord@VICSIG.alphalink.com.au) wrote:
> > > 2. Is Melbourne-Adelaide via Gheringhap really the better route
> > > operationally, or was it just cheaper to convert?
> > 
> > It was definately the better route. Avoids Ingliston Bank and Warrenheip
> > Bank.

> If the Miludra line is converted to SG then one of the many options is
> to make Nth Geelong - Ballarat Dual Gauge,

The last thing I want to see is North Geelong - Ballarat dual gauge! it
should be two single lines, one of each gauge.

Cheers
David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: standardising Victoria
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>

References:
- standardising Victoria
  - From: "geoff dawson" <geoffrey.dawson@aph.gov.au>
- Re: standardising Victoria
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: standardising Victoria
  - From: Chris Gordon <cmgord@VICSIG.alphalink.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Powerhouse Museum Manning Wardle 0-4-0 saddle tank.
Next by Date: Re: Powerhouse Museum Manning Wardle 0-4-0 saddle tank.
Prev by thread: Re: standardising Victoria
Next by thread: Re: standardising Victoria
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread