[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Sydney Light Rail




Barry Campbell <campblbm@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
V3_D5.22948$O7.338956@ozemail.com.au">news:V3_D5.22948$O7.338956@ozemail.com.au...
>
> Samuel Eades wrote in message ...
> >
> >
> >If a tramway started using the same lines as a railway, then that portion
> >(IMHO) would have to become a railway as well (the difference between a
> >tramway and a railway being that a tramway does not use any safeworking
> >systems.
>
> <snip>
>
> Is that so? I suppose the state government could always change the
> definition (if that is the definition in the first place). The distinction
> is a matter of statute law. Are there any lawyers lurking in this ng?

That's the definition I have always known...

The government could change the definition, but then it may compromise the
safety of passengers. workers and vehicles.

Sam