[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Sydney Light Rail

Subject: Re: Sydney Light Rail
From: "Barry Campbell" <campblbm@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 22:43:31 +1000
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: OzEmail Ltd, Australia
References: <39E04AE0.709D0F29@magna.com.au> <wYZD5.11537$aD2.43519@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:20978


Samuel Eades wrote in message ...
>
>
>If a tramway started using the same lines as a railway, then that portion
>(IMHO) would have to become a railway as well (the difference between a
>tramway and a railway being that a tramway does not use any safeworking
>systems.

<snip>

Is that so? I suppose the state government could always change the
definition (if that is the definition in the first place). The distinction
is a matter of statute law. Are there any lawyers lurking in this ng?

Barry Campbell

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sydney Light Rail
  - From: "Samuel Eades" <seades@bigpond.net.au>
- Re: Sydney Light Rail
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>

References:
- Sydney Light Rail
  - From: Peter Bollard <onk@magna.com.au>
- Re: Sydney Light Rail
  - From: "Samuel Eades" <seades@bigpond.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Sydney Light Rail
Next by Date: Re: Sydney Light Rail
Prev by thread: Re: Sydney Light Rail
Next by thread: Re: Sydney Light Rail
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread