Re: NSW - Is it time for one timetable?

["Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>]

"Hubert Lam" <hubert@imap4.com> wrote in message
39d71cd9$0$26533$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:39d71cd9$0$26533$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
> But for such a busy section of track, IMHO there should be NIL level
> crossings!

Of course, but it is hardly a huge amount, and far less than exists on the
Richmond line.

Dave

> "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
> 7uEB5.47372$A4.1531537@news1.giganews.com">news:7uEB5.47372$A4.1531537@news1.giganews.com...
> | "Hubert Lam" <hubert@imap4.com> wrote in message
> | 8r6q9v$8qr$1@nnrp1.deja.com">news:8r6q9v$8qr$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> | > According to an official CityRail document "October 1996 Timetable
> | > Review" (dated late 1995), it is not feasible to have one train every
> | > 15 min on the Richmond line, primarily due to the large number of
level
> | > crossings (hmm...what about the Liverpool via Granville section???)
> |
> | Liverpool via Granville has very few - one at Firfield, one at Liverpool
> and
> | one at Casula, the last time I looked.
> |
> | Dave
> |
> |
>
>