[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NSW - Is it time for one timetable?
- Subject: Re: NSW - Is it time for one timetable?
- From: "Hubert Lam" <hubert@imap4.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 22:09:42 +1000
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- References: <39cf0e6b@news.iprimus.com.au> <39cf76a7$0$26533$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <tZQz5.47$tc6.1851@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net> <b1v0ts4c0o6b6oao8611ll34qr8pnshf77@4ax.com> <39D219A9.7036595B@ozemail.com.au> <rap5tsoa9ith8krqea8a1lhtrbugohagm7@4ax.com> <39D3F1DB.467460D0@ozemail.com.au> <a35btsgi25cjtnis4r090p7n9eci4nhnmu@4ax.com> <39d5e6af$0$26529$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <gIzB5.14341$O7.195491@ozemail.com.au> <8r6q9v$8qr$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7uEB5.47372$A4.1531537@news1.giganews.com>
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:20219
But for such a busy section of track, IMHO there should be NIL level
crossings!
"Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
7uEB5.47372$A4.1531537@news1.giganews.com">news:7uEB5.47372$A4.1531537@news1.giganews.com...
| "Hubert Lam" <hubert@imap4.com> wrote in message
| 8r6q9v$8qr$1@nnrp1.deja.com">news:8r6q9v$8qr$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
| > According to an official CityRail document "October 1996 Timetable
| > Review" (dated late 1995), it is not feasible to have one train every
| > 15 min on the Richmond line, primarily due to the large number of level
| > crossings (hmm...what about the Liverpool via Granville section???)
|
| Liverpool via Granville has very few - one at Firfield, one at Liverpool
and
| one at Casula, the last time I looked.
|
| Dave
|
|