Re: [OT] 48 class

["Rod Gayford" <rjaygee@eisa.net.au>]

So who won the prize for the most idiotic comment.  We still have not heard
a logical reason why the 48 was trying to make its way along tracks that had
a good possibility of being scoured by fllood waters with the resulting huge
damages bill. Why not send a hi railer out first to test the track in the
first indstance?
Cheers
Rod Gayford

"keith malcolm" <kmalcolm@tpg.com.au> wrote in message
CR1T5.88$wI1.20472@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net">news:CR1T5.88$wI1.20472@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net...
>
> Tezza <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
> 3a1bf840$0$19424$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3a1bf840$0$19424$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
> >
> > "Dave Proctor"
> > > "Tezza"
> > > > "Dave Proctor"
> > > > > "Tom"
> > > >
> > > > > > so what was the 48 doing out there?
> > > > >
> > > > > Going from somewhere to somewhere else?
> > > >
> > > > Conditional or mandatory?
> > >
> > > Who cares? Either way, it was going from somewhere to somewhere else,
> which
> > is why it
> > > was there.
> >
> > But who was gonna change the lightbulb?
> >
> >
>
> More to the point, were the crew wearing ties?
>
> Dave Malcolm
>
>