[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why keep Clyde?

Subject: Re: Why keep Clyde?
From: Malcolm Purvis <malcolmpurvis@optushome.com.au>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 10:23:28 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: @Home Network
References: <3A09EAF2.2F7C7EB1@dontspamme.au1.ibm.com> <3a09f794$0$19429$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <m366lwyt3l.fsf@co3018576-a.rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au> <3A0BF48D.E87374@ozemail.com.au> <m3wvebxauh.fsf@co3018576-a.rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au> <3A0E83C2.5D57D754@ozemail.com.au>
Sender: malcolmp@co3018576-a.rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Canyonlands)
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:24421

>>>>> "David" == David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au> writes:

David> You still need to double shunt to get to rookwood siding!

I finally had a chance today to have a look at the layout and I own you an
apology.  I could have sworn that there was a connection between Platform 3
and the Rookwood siding, but it isn't there now!  Perhaps is was removed when
the track was relaid sometime in the early 90s?

Malcolm - Who must pay closer attention.

References:
- Why keep Clyde?
  - From: Peter Degotardi <peterdeg@dontspamme.au1.ibm.com>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: Malcolm Purvis <malcolmpurvis@optushome.com.au>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: Malcolm Purvis <malcolmpurvis@optushome.com.au>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Melways vs. Sydway (Was: Travel patterns (was Re: New form of rail transportation))
Next by Date: Re: how many cityrail employees can you fit into a drivers cab?
Prev by thread: Re: Why keep Clyde?
Next by thread: Re: Why keep Clyde?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread