[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why keep Clyde?

Subject: Re: Why keep Clyde?
From: Malcolm Purvis <malcolmpurvis@optushome.com.au>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 06:48:49 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: @Home Network
References: <3A09EAF2.2F7C7EB1@dontspamme.au1.ibm.com> <3a09f794$0$19429$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <m366lwyt3l.fsf@co3018576-a.rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au> <3A0BF48D.E87374@ozemail.com.au>
Sender: malcolmp@co3018576-a.rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Canyonlands)
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:24114

>>>>> "David" == David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au> writes:

>> c) Use the old Rookwood siding (which I notice got some use during the
>> Olympics)

David> c) makes no sense.  Clyde is on the up side.  Rookwood is on the down
David> side.  There is no direct route from Carlingford to Rookwood without
David> shunting.

It makes no sense if you terminate at Lidcombe platform 1, but what about on
platform 3?  IIRC, the crossover can occur somewhere near Aurburn station.

Malcolm

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: "Peter Cook" <deletethispetercook@nospam.optusnet.com.au>

References:
- Why keep Clyde?
  - From: Peter Degotardi <peterdeg@dontspamme.au1.ibm.com>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: Malcolm Purvis <malcolmpurvis@optushome.com.au>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: (Vic, Melb) Maribyrnong Siding.
Next by Date: Re: T67
Prev by thread: Re: Why keep Clyde?
Next by thread: Re: Why keep Clyde?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread