[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT

Subject: Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 05:34:22 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: CWO Customer - reports relating to abuse should be sent to abuse@optus.net.au
References: <YFrM5.152$zs5.6406@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net> <3A0247EA.28F4D43B@VICSIG.alphalink.com.au>
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:22391

Chris Gordon (cmgord@VICSIG.alphalink.com.au) wrote:
> > Out of curisity. I was wondering how valid is the NSW rail safety act in the
> > ACT? The railway to Canberra is in the ACT from just west of Queanbeyan and
> > is operated under NSW rules.

> What about Echuca - Deniliquin/Moulamein, Yarrawonga - Oaklands? (and
> Tocumwal)

They are formally owned by Victoria. The only argument with NSW was some
minor point about who was responsible for laying bitumen on sealed level
crossings. The rules are different in the two states.

Cheers
David

References:
- Rail Safety Act in ACT
  - From: "keith malcolm" <kmalcolm@tpg.com.au>
- Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
  - From: Chris Gordon <cmgord@VICSIG.alphalink.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [melb] Yarra Trams Network Observations
Next by Date: Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
Prev by thread: Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
Next by thread: Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread