Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT

["Graeme Cleak" <gcleak@optusnet.com.au>]

Ah, but at least RAC etc publish nice hard-copy timetables which are
relatively easy to obtain.

--
Graeme Cleak
Maurie Daly <mauried@tpg.com.au> wrote in message
3a074d30.516123@can-news.tpg.com.au">news:3a074d30.516123@can-news.tpg.com.au...
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 20:29:49 +1100, "keith malcolm"
> <kmalcolm@tpg.com.au> wrote:
>
> >
> >David Bromage <dbromage@fang.omni.com.au> wrote in message
> >b1qN5.70$RH2.2899@news0.optus.net.au">news:b1qN5.70$RH2.2899@news0.optus.net.au...
> >> Maurie Daly (mauried@tpg.com.au) wrote:
> >> > The last thing on the planet we need is for the ACT Govt to take over
> >> > the line.
> >> > This would mean an ACT Rail Safety Act,
> >>
> >> There isn't one at the moment. If the ACT does own the line, there is
no
> >> leglislation covering it.
> >>
> >
> >This was the whole basis behind my original question. I was wondering how
a
> >NSW act can be applied in the ACT?
>
> It cant be applied.
> More likely bluff on the part of the NSW DOT.
> >
> >> One option might be to make Joppa Jcn - Canberra part of ARTC, given
that
> >> it is technically an interstate route, and remove the prohibition on NR
> >> operating to Canberra.
> >>
> >
> >God no, things would be even worse then. It's bad enough having to deal
with
> >controlers in Sydney let alone Adelade. I suppose the ARHS could supply
> >train control services like we do from Harman to Royalla.
> >
> >Dave Malcolm
> >
> >
> What does it matter where the controllers are ?
> The question is whether dealing with ARTC is any better or worse than
> dealing with RAC.
> At least ARTC publishes its track access charges.
>
> MD
> .
>
> >
>