[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why keep Clyde?

Subject: Re: Why keep Clyde?
From: "Glen O'Riley" <glen.orileyDES@PAMlinx.iwarp.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 09:38:21 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: The Internet Group (Sydney)
References: <3A09EAF2.2F7C7EB1@dontspamme.au1.ibm.com> <3a09f794$0$19429$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <m366lwyt3l.fsf@co3018576-a.rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au> <3a0c03d0$0$19404$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:24090

This is only a question/suggestion but I am thinking, what about removing
the Regents Park service which they seem fairly confident they are going to
do according to the network maps at Central, and instead of replacing it
with buses, run a service from Bankstown via Regents Park all stops to
Olympic Park or would the crossover from right to left create too many
hassles and an over/under pass be too expensive??

References:
- Why keep Clyde?
  - From: Peter Degotardi <peterdeg@dontspamme.au1.ibm.com>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: Malcolm Purvis <malcolmpurvis@optushome.com.au>
- Re: Why keep Clyde?
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Why keep Clyde?
Next by Date: Re: [melb] Connex refurb set(s)
Prev by thread: Re: Why keep Clyde?
Next by thread: Re: Why keep Clyde?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread