[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SLR - Extension construction

Subject: Re: SLR - Extension construction
From: "Bill McNiven" <wmcniven@gunzel.ozemail.com.au>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 18:32:49 +1000
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: aus.rail,misc.transport.rail.australia-nz
Organization: OzEmail Ltd, Australia
References: <8g5tvn$t6t$1@metro.ucc.usyd.edu.au> <3927ECA0.5587153B@yahoo.com> <8g9rp4$6o8$1@metro.ucc.usyd.edu.au> <py1W4.49$AT5.2497@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:9795

geoff dawson wrote in message ...
>If it was desired to extend the light rail to Summer Hill or Dulwich Hill
>(which I would advocate), would there be any physical or technical
>impediment to sharing the line with goods trains? Assuming that the
>frequency was such that paths for the goods trains could be found.


Given that the freight operations to Rozelle are rather infrequent, what
would be the chance of having a single-track de-electrified freight line and
a single-track 750V electrified Light Rail line?  Maybe the Light Rail would
need a crossing loop or two.

Just a thought!

Bill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SLR - Extension construction
  - From: craigd@lios.apana.org.au (C. Dewick)

References:
- SLR - Extension construction
  - From: matthew@mail.usyd.edu.au (Matthew Geier)
- Re: SLR - Extension construction
  - From: Ben <sporologist@yahoo.com>
- Re: SLR - Extension construction
  - From: matthew@mail.usyd.edu.au (Matthew Geier)
- Re: SLR - Extension construction
  - From: "geoff dawson" <geoffrey.dawson@aph.gov.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [melb] new trams and seating
Next by Date: Re: [NSW] New Southern Rwy??
Prev by thread: Re: SLR - Extension construction
Next by thread: Re: SLR - Extension construction
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread