Re: [NSW] Female guards are hopeless!!!

["Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>]

Just shows it pays to read all of the posts in a thread before replying to
one. I agree 100%, this accident could very well have occurred with a male
guard.

Dave

"Rod Gayford" <rjaygee@smartchat.net.au> wrote in message
8fl0lc$htg$1@merki.connect.com.au">news:8fl0lc$htg$1@merki.connect.com.au...
> David Bennett jumped in before I had a chance to reply to the earlier
> anti-female posting. I totally agree it seems like a training issue.
Maybe
> male trainers are being discriminatory by not training female guards
> properly or providing incorrect information.  Yes it is sexist rubbish and
> should not have been posted. By the way do not be tempted by EISA's 1 cent
> per minute offer as their news server is hopeless.  I have not been able
to
> log into Ausrail for ages and had to rely on the Railpage Archive section
> for access.
>
> Cheers
> Rod Gayford
>
> "David Bennetts" <davibenn@pcug.org.au> wrote in message
> 391dfb11@newshost.pcug.org.au">news:391dfb11@newshost.pcug.org.au...
> > What a load of sexist rubbish.
> >
> > OK you make the point about the guard not knowing her job - if she
doesn't
> > know the job after training then there's something wrong with the
process
> > which gives her a piece of paper saying she's competent to do it.
> >
> > It doesn't matter whether the person is male or female, you can't have a
> > training process which assumes that trainees have absorbed all the
theory
> > and can put it into practice without adequate evaluation.
> >
> > If these guards don't know enough, then it's the training and
> accreditation
> > which isn't any good, not their fault.
> >
> > David Bennetts
> > Canberra
> >
> >
> >
>
>