Re: National Express does it again

["Mike Hunt" <grimegrime@hotmail.com>]

Is the signal maintenance contractor hired by National Express? or by some
other entity,like VicTrack?
Not trying to start an argument here just attempting to get my facts right.
Mike
"Chris" <csinn@netlink.com.au> wrote in message
news:39506F32.7DAC@netlink.com.au...
> Mike Hunt wrote:
> >
> > I would have thought in this instance that this is not National Express
but
> > the maintenance contractor who is the problem.
> > Since when did National Express start fixing blown globes and vandalised
> > signals?
> > Mike
> > "James C" <jamesccj@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
> > 394f7422$0$17001$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:394f7422$0$17001$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
> > > Is there a regulation such that if the private operator performs badly
> > > they might get liquidation ??
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > James
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Chris <csinn@netlink.com.au> wrote in message
> > > 394F4CB4.483E@netlink.com.au">news:394F4CB4.483E@netlink.com.au...
> > > > First it was lack of safety on the trams. W class with faulty
brakes,
> > > > insulated trams. Now train drivers at Bayside have taken strike
action
> > > > over faulty signals on the Pakenham, Dandenong line.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.abc.net.au/news/state/vic/metvic-20jun2000-17.htm
> > >
> > >
> Are they not responsible for what their contractors do. Are you saying
> they did not know about the problem?