[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Disused railway lines considered for reopening

Subject: Re: Disused railway lines considered for reopening
From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 23:58:40 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Another Optus Customer
References: <B7i35.1546$y63.493184@news0.optus.net.au> <394DFB50.88B390C9@attglobal.net> <P8z35.1711$M2.440936@news0.optus.net.au> <7pC35.19096$N4.741662@ozemail.com.au> <7dE35.221$zJ5.3663@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net> <394F5AB8.6D64AA3B@attglobal.net>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:12716

Bruce Greening (bgreeni@attglobal.net) wrote:
> To David Bromage.
> Michalago - Cooma is not on the list. Queanbeyan - Hume is open now and there
> is no plan to extend this (other than the existing ARHS operation)

Maybe there is no RAC plan to reopen. Various logging companies (and FA)
have other ideas about hauling logs.

Cheers
David

References:
- Disused railway lines considered for reopening
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: Disused railway lines considered for reopening
  - From: Bruce Greening <bgreeni@attglobal.net>
- Re: Disused railway lines considered for reopening
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: Disused railway lines considered for reopening
  - From: Bruce Greening <bgreeni@attglobal.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Question re: overlap
Next by Date: Re: Ararat seeks public's view of planned rail restart
Prev by thread: Re: Disused railway lines considered for reopening
Next by thread: Re: Disused railway lines considered for reopening
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread