[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: electric loco 4501 or 7100

Subject: Re: electric loco 4501 or 7100
From: Jonathan Lau <jonlau@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 23:25:47 +1000
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: New Wave Logistics Australia
References: <39474F03.B3ECCFB6@enet21.com.au> <8i90uu$mmh$1@gossamer.itmel.bhp.com.au> <CsU15.29$re6.398911@news0.optus.net.au> <3948A233.5E794DDB@enet21.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:12296

chris wrote:

> I had thought it was kinda complete, as I heard a story that it wouldn't take
> much to get it going again except the will of the RTM's management.
>

Externally is seems ok (apart from a smashed window), but apparently it's missing
a lot of the power equipment.

Anyway, if 7100 was working order, the RTM would have used it to run tours instead
of letting it sitting quietly for the past 25 years.

Jon Lau

References:
- electric loco 4501 or 7001
  - From: chris <chris@enet21.com.au>
- Re: electric loco 4501 or 7001
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: electric loco 4501 or 7001
  - From: chris <chris@enet21.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Signal Failure @ East Hills Line!!!
Next by Date: Re: [Vic] Metcard - What could be done.
Prev by thread: Re: electric loco 4501 or 7001
Next by thread: Re: electric loco 4501 or 7001
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread