[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class

Subject: Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
From: billboltonREMOVE-TO-EMAIL@computer.org (Bill Bolton)
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 22:41:31 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
References: <3938ec83.504656@news.one.net.au> <3939BA15.E75DF632@primus.com.au> <393A1930.4D5B@iprolink.co.nz> <393b711f@grissom> <17U_4.14105$c5.23394@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>
Reply-To: billboltonREMOVE-TO-EMAIL@computer.org (Bill Bolton)
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:11750

"D. Lindstrom" <D_Lindstrom@Bigpond.com> wrote:

> They seem happy enough on the City Circle Ws.

I strongly suspect that the "fare", i.e. free, has more than a little
to do with that.

Cheers,

Bill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
  - From: "D. Lindstrom" <D_Lindstrom@Bigpond.com>

References:
- [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
  - From: tram@ding.ding (W-Class)
- Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
  - From: Richard <richard_snook@primus.com.au>
- Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
  - From: Evad Rehtona <davemclAXETHIS@iprolink.co.nz>
- Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
  - From: "Ross $Goldie$ Goldspink" <goldicom@powerup.com.au>
- Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
  - From: "D. Lindstrom" <D_Lindstrom@Bigpond.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Whats your fav loco?
Next by Date: Re: [Melb] South Kensington Signal Failure
Prev by thread: Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
Next by thread: Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread