[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class

Subject: Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
From: Evad Rehtona <davemclAXETHIS@iprolink.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2000 20:54:08 +1200
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Obscure
References: <3938ec83.504656@news.one.net.au> <3939BA15.E75DF632@primus.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:11472

Richard wrote:

> What tram routes would suit a "tourist' tag.  Maybe instead of begrudging the
> loss of the W's ..its time to be proactive and pre-empt their loss and
> convince the new guys to use them on specific runs..

Well the Ws are meant to be operated on four specific runs deemed
attractive to tourists:

the City Circle
Toorak 8
Sth Melbourne & St Kilda Beach 12 (via Collins St)
St Kilda Beach 16 (via Swantson St)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
  - From: "Ross \(Goldie\) Goldspink" <goldicom@powerup.com.au>

References:
- [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
  - From: tram@ding.ding (W-Class)
- Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
  - From: Richard <richard_snook@primus.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Whats your fav loco?
Next by Date: Re: Anita (OT sort of from the start)
Prev by thread: Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
Next by thread: Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread