Re: Brief trip report MEL-CBR-MEL and thoughts on 737 vs A320 cabins.

["Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>]

"Leo Hamulczyk" <pagophilus@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:SJSe5.44780$N4.1619683@ozemail.com.au...
>
> Skippy <fowler9@skippy9spammeifyoudare.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> 8le82g$erm$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk">news:8le82g$erm$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > (cross posted to aus.rail & misc.transport.rail.australia-nz &
> > rec.travel.air)
> >
> > Here is another case for the SpeedRAIL alternative. Would you have gone
by
> > train if it was comparable to flying time. By that I mean the time it
> takes
> > to get from your house to the airport, check-in board depart land pick
up
> > bag (if any) then get to your destination against leaving your home,
> getting
> > to the station, boarding the train, arriving at destination.
>
> Probable not. Trains are not as interesting as planes.

Who says? I find both interesting.

> If I had to go for some reason, then maybe.

Which is the point of the whole discussion. Which would be the preferred
mode on this sector for people who *have* to travel.

Dave