[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Trans Adelaide impression

Subject: Re: Trans Adelaide impression
From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2000 23:39:51 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Another Optus Customer
References: <39613a62$0$17021$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3961baec@kastagir.senet.com.au> <3961c745$0$29260$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:13726

James C (noemail@emailsux.com) wrote:
> Now this is interesting:-) I heard  of Jumbos have a rather expensive
> operating cost due to more expensive maintenance and less fuel efficiency
> engine compare with 3000/3100 class DMU.

Very much more expensive to run. They weigh 80t for a start.

This was proposed some time ago, but Victrack canned it on principle.
There are some clearance problems.

Cheers
David

References:
- Trans Adelaide impression
  - From: "James C" <noemail@emailsux.com>
- Re: Trans Adelaide impression
  - From: "Chris Drymalik" <drymalik@arcom.com.au>
- Re: Trans Adelaide impression
  - From: "James C" <noemail@emailsux.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Trans Adelaide impression
Next by Date: Re: VFT Sydney - Canberra
Prev by thread: Re: Trans Adelaide impression
Next by thread: Re: Trans Adelaide impression
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread