[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [VIC] H220 (was: Surviving R classes)

Subject: Re: [VIC] H220 (was: Surviving R classes)
From: John Duncan McCallum <mccallum@melbpc.org.au>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 19:09:46 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Melbourne PC User Group
References: <018ed270.5f000f2a@usw-ex0102-013.remarq.com> <38853574.B6685B34@ozemail.com.au> <udth4.23$0T.387439@news0.optus.net.au> <38868740.FA34C308@ozemail.com.au> <5qkl8s86d8dlevl1jonf470fdvk6q4rhgf@4ax.com> <86ft49$a4a$1@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au> <86r8jt$fvv$1@nnrp1.deja.com>



bf0017@hotmail.com wrote:

> imagine if everything went the way of the D-58s, Dds, 720s et al!!
> 
> Brett

There are in fact two Dd class locos preserved. 592 was in serviceable
condition for
a while. I think boiler condition sidelined it.
There are however no Dm or Ds preserved.

John McCallum

References:
- West Coast Railway and 6042 - AD60 Garrett
  - From: darin <darin.o'brienNOdaSPAM@dhs.vic.gov.au.invalid>
- Re: [VIC] H220 (was: Surviving R classes)
  - From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [VIC] H220 (was: Surviving R classes)
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: [VIC] H220 (was: Surviving R classes)
  - From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [VIC] H220 (was: Surviving R classes)
  - From: John Dennis <jdennis@mpx.com.au>
- Re: [VIC] H220 (was: Surviving R classes)
  - From: "Stuart Thyer" <s.thyer@anatomy.unimelb.edu.au>
- Re: [VIC] H220 (was: Surviving R classes)
  - From: bf0017@hotmail.com

Prev by Date: Concord West NSW
Next by Date: Re: Wegmann Sleeper question
Prev by thread: Re: [VIC] H220 (was: Surviving R classes)
Next by thread: Re: [VIC] H220 (was: Surviving R classes)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread