[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "lost" trains

Subject: Re: "lost" trains
From: RNS <steam3801@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 19:57:53 +1100
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: OzEmail Ltd, Australia
References: <38620F35.541EA4D7@the.coal.face.net> <38621202.B85D5466@ozemail.com.au> <3863048e@pink.one.net.au> <3863646C.9B250D52@the.coal.face.net> <oN9lOHUiPEc2+rJjoWldEoJSHFdD@4ax.com> <12208e20.ae97b200@usw-ex0107-043.remarq.com> <2sko6sghnn6hsi1jldmplv0kv3fvo8j1t2@4ax.com> <84hnk1$g16$2@news1.mpx.com.au> <vl2r6s0jclj1qqbfqiojm0q0gthrce15lu@4ax.com> <84k3dm$qq1$1@news1.mpx.com.au> <hnr07s851nn1cboe0okruib29q8q0sbu8s@4ax.com> <84psja$d9q$1@news1.mpx.com.au>


Assumptions in an industry like rail are what causes accidents.
Caution is always the right attitude in safety, no matter what
industry we are discussing.








On Mon, 3 Jan 2000 21:05:53 +1100, "Dave Proctor"
<thadocta@spambait.dingoblue.net.au> wrote:

>RNS wrote in message ...
>>
>>Because that was reported at the time. The signal person at Hawkesbury
>>River had been talking to the interurban driver about the steam train
>>ahead having trouble.
>
>But it would not be unreasonable to assume that the steam train had got over
>its troubles if confronted with a green signal, would it/
>
>Dave
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "lost" trains
  - From: Tony Gatt <baulko@tig.com.au>
- Re: "lost" trains
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <thadocta@spambait.dingoblue.net.au>

References:
- Re: "lost" trains
  - From: RNS <steam3801@hotmail.com>
- Re: "lost" trains
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <thadocta@spambait.dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: "lost" trains
  - From: RNS <steam3801@hotmail.com>
- Re: "lost" trains
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <thadocta@spambait.dingoblue.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: High-voltage track circuits
Next by Date: Re: Ghan
Prev by thread: Re: "lost" trains
Next by thread: Re: "lost" trains
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread