Re: Drivers and guards to be sacked.

["Russell Norton" <russelln@iprimus.com.au>]

"Tony Gatt" <baulko@tig.com.au> wrote in message
8nl099$ian$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au">news:8nl099$ian$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au...
> Nice to see Tezza is as accepting of criticism as he always was..
>
> read on..
>
> Tezza <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
> 399d582c$0$786$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:399d582c$0$786$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
> >
> > "Tony Gatt" <baulko@tig.com.au> wrote in message
> > 8niq0e$9pg$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au">news:8niq0e$9pg$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au...
> > > Ahhh, if they haven't been issued with the correct uniform, then the
> > > employer has a responsibility, but if they have, and just won't wear
it,
> > I'd
> > > be lining up the letters as well.
> > >
> > > Companies have policies, and dress standards are one of them.
> > > (so are obeying signals but thats another story..)
> >
> > So, go past a signal at stop - no sack
> > Wear wrong coloured material - sacked. Makes heaps of sense to me.
>
> U take that one up with Cityrail. They are the ones still allowing
> "dangerous drivers" to roam the rails, not me. I remember the days when a
> serious "mistake" still landed you back in safeworking school for a
> "refresher course". But the Olympics are coming, we cant upset that.

I remember those days to, although a serious mistake usually sent you back
to the shed at DELEC for 6 months. It would seem the "Railways" have always
catered for idiots. Why else would they let a certain driver keep his job,
after he refused to go past a green signal because it was possessed by the
devil.

I could list all the star performers, and their infamous f**kups over the
years (and these people invariably kept their jobs), but I don't think this
ng would appreciate a 1 meg post.

Russ.