Re: Drivers and guards to be sacked.

["Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>]

"Tony Gatt" <baulko@tig.com.au> wrote in message
8niq0e$9pg$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au">news:8niq0e$9pg$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au...
> Ahhh, if they haven't been issued with the correct uniform, then the
> employer has a responsibility, but if they have, and just won't wear it,
I'd
> be lining up the letters as well.
>
> Companies have policies, and dress standards are one of them.
> (so are obeying signals but thats another story..)

So, go past a signal at stop - no sack
Wear wrong coloured material - sacked. Makes heaps of sense to me.

>
> Speaking as an employer..
> If the individual refuses to wear the uniform prescribed, then he is
indeed
> saying that he doesn't wish to conform to the employers conditions and
> therefore forfeits the right to his "livelihood". The unemployment office
do
> not require a dress standard and he may well be more suited to that. If he
> wishes to remain employed, then it is my suggestion that he complies with
> the dress standard.


Oh, as long as it's that important! Sack 'em all!