[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New Melbourne trams have fewer seats than the old ones but they're longer!

Subject: Re: New Melbourne trams have fewer seats than the old ones but they're longer!
From: Andrew Price <aprice@mail.dotcom.fr>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 23:58:21 +0200
Newsgroups: aus.rail,misc.transport.urban-transit
Organization: SWW
References: <399DE6E7.7629@iprolink.co.nz> <Rlon5.14$tY6.8666@news0.optus.net.au> <399E13FC.6518@iprolink.co.nz> <01c009d4$42b44100$LocalHost@a1b04937> <399EF8B2.6B26@iprolink.co.nz>
Reply-To: andrew.price@free.fr
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:16420

On Sun, 20 Aug 2000 09:14:26 +1200, David McLoughlin
<davemclNOSPAM@iprolink.co.nz> wrote:

>The idiots probably
>don't even know that all previous Melbourne trams have been built in
>Melbourne and designed for Melbourne conditions. I suspect the idiots
>responsible have never even been in a tram.

But regretfully, if the idiots are the franchise holders, then
"tough".

References:
- Re: New Melbourne trams have fewer seats than the old ones but they're longer!
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: New Melbourne trams have fewer seats than the old ones but they're longer!
  - From: David McLoughlin <davemclNOSPAM@iprolink.co.nz>
- Re: New Melbourne trams have fewer seats than the old ones but they're longer!
  - From: "Test For Echo" <testforecho@ultranet.ca>
- Re: New Melbourne trams have fewer seats than the old ones but they're longer!
  - From: David McLoughlin <davemclNOSPAM@iprolink.co.nz>

Prev by Date: Re: New Melbourne trams have fewer seats than the old ones but they're longer!
Next by Date: Re: 40 Million (for NSW track improvements)
Prev by thread: Re: New Melbourne trams have fewer seats than the old ones but they're longer!
Next by thread: Re: New Melbourne trams have fewer seats than the old ones but they're longer!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread