[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [General] Signal failures

Subject: Re: [General] Signal failures
From: pdwyer <pdwyerNOpdSPAM@ecn.net.au.invalid>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 19:05:15 -0700
Bytes: 640
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: http://www.remarq.com: The World's Usenet/Discussions Start Here
References: <K_Cm5.32247$c5.90308@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <399B3A20.CD6D392C@yahoo.com> <8ng9tq$bn1$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au> <399C7B7F.DB85087@yahoo.com> <8ni0m0$vg0$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:16302

In article <8ni0m0$vg0$1@bugstomper.ihug.com.au>, "Tony Gatt"
<baulko@tig.com.au> wrote:
> No. The "normal" state of a track circuit is "occupied" If it is
> as simple as a dodgy trk cct relay maybe it could be overridden, but
> if it is a broken rail or broken trk cct bond (if they still exist
> between KPK and EPP) then the cct will still fail and remain down.

   Oops, you mean the quiescent state of a track circuit is 'clear' or
vacant.

Seeya!

* Sent from Novell Discussion Forums http://novell.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!

References:
- [General] Signal failures
  - From: "Ronald BESDANSKY" <ronbest@bigpond.com>
- Re: [General] Signal failures
  - From: Sam Eades <eadess@yahoo.com>
- Re: [General] Signal failures
  - From: "Tony Gatt" <baulko@tig.com.au>
- Re: [General] Signal failures
  - From: Sam Eades <eadess@yahoo.com>
- Re: [General] Signal failures
  - From: "Tony Gatt" <baulko@tig.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: How long is a chain?
Next by Date: Re: [General] Signal failures
Prev by thread: Re: [General] Signal failures
Next by thread: Re: [General] Signal failures
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread